Corn vs. Sugar Industries Legal Battle Heats Up Over “High Fructose Corn Syrup” Name Change

For Immediate Release

October 3, 2011

Contact:

Glenn Turner, 917-817-3396

glenn@ripplestrategies.com

 

New Website FoodIdentityTheft.com

Provides Background for Reporters and Consumers

Expert Legal Spokesperson Available For Interviews

WASHINGTON, October 3, 2011 – High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) is a man-made sweetener used in thousands of grocery store products and it has a serious image problem. Consumers are avoiding it. Food companies are taking it out of the products they make. Some supermarkets have banned it. Demand for this highly-processed ingredient is falling fast.

The Corn Refiners Association – comprised of corporations that make HFCS – decided that changing the name was a way to fix this problem. They are petitioning the FDA so that HFCS can legally be called “corn sugar” and ultimately just “sugar”. An official decision hasn’t yet been made, but in 2008 the Corn Refiners Association began a $50 million dollar marketing campaign labeling HFCS as “corn sugar”. They are now being sued by a group of sugar farmers and refiners who believe the name change will confuse consumers and harm the sugar industry.

This issue saw significant media attention on September 13, 2011 as The Corn Refiners Association filed a motion to dismiss which U.S. District Judge Consuelo Marshall is currently considering.

While the legal decision is pending, Citizens for Health, one of the nation’s most respected consumer advocacy groups, has launched a new website, FoodIdentityTheft.com, to alert and inform Americans about misleading labeling on many food, beverage and health products.

“Every day we see stories about food makers trying to pull a fast one on consumers,” said Jim Turner, consumer advocate and Chairman of Citizens for Health.  ”Resources like FoodIdentityTheft.com are necessary to ensure that consumers are aware of the deceptive practices some corporations are using.”

FoodIdentityTheft.com provides current information on many vital issues, beginning with the controversy surrounding the proposed name change of High Fructose Corn Syrup.

“Many consumers believe that the U.S. government will protect us from false advertising or stop corporations from making unproven claims about their products,” said FoodIdentityTheft.com Senior Editor, Linda Bonvie.  ”But the truth is, corporations have a huge influence in Washington.  We as consumers have to protect ourselves, stay informed, and tell our legislators and government agencies that we won’t accept being lied to.”

According to Bonvie, “FoodIdentityTheft.com is not advocating the benefits or decrying the harm of this product.  We simply believe there is no valid reason for the name change. It would only confuse consumers and allow food makers to conceal the identity of this product on ingredients labels.”

About Citizens for Health

Funded by concerned consumers, non-profit partners, food growers, and businesses, Citizens for Health is a non-profit organization that provides over 100,000 supporters with the latest consumer news, action alerts, and ways to demand access to healthy food, non-toxic products, and truthful, non-misleading health information.  More information is available at www.citizens.org

Warning: The Dietary Supplement Safety Act

Citizens for Health

www.citizens.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

February 8, 2010

CONTACT: Glenn Turner, 917-817-3396 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 917-817-3396 end_of_the_skype_highlighting or Shayna Samuels, 718-541-4785 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 718-541-4785 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

McCain / Dorgan “Dietary Supplement Safety Act” Would Cripple Nutritional Products Industry While Doing Nothing to Protect Consumers from Dangerous Performance Enhancing Drugs, Says Nonprofit Consumer Group

Interviews Available with Jim Turner, Chair of Citizens for Health
& Leading Expert on Consumer Access to Dietary Supplements

On Thursday, Feb. 4, 2010, Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) introduced The Dietary Supplement Safety Act (DSSA) of 2010. This bill would amend the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), undermining, if not entirely eliminating, consumer access to valuable dietary supplements, according to Jim Turner, Citizens for Health Board Chair.

The bill would reverse supplements’ 100 year long status as foods, create onerous requirements for supplements not applied to other foods or even to prescription drugs, and wipe out significant numbers of small supplement manufacturers and sellers.

“This bill, typical of Washington’s destroy the economy, wipe out consumer rights, and undermine individual health mentality, thoughtlessly reinforces the costly, unresponsive, dangerous policies that have created an unsafe and depleted food supply and a bankrupt health care system” says Turner.

James S. Turner is a partner in the Washington, DC, law firm of Swankin & Turner, formed in 1973, and Board Chair of Citizens for Health, the consumer voice of the natural health community. In 1994, he worked with the newly created Citizens for Health to send over a half million communications to Congress in support of DSHEA, which then passed.

Citizens for Health Analysis of the McCain / Dorgan Bill:

Introduced by Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) on February 4th as the “Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010,” S. 3002 is designed, says the bill preamble, to “more effectively regulate dietary supplements that may pose safety risks unknown to consumers.”

Following a surge of anti-doping initiatives and announcements dating back to a September 29, 2009 — when the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs heard the testimony of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency USADA), and to a December 2nd, 2009 USADA press conference — the proposed bill would dramatically: cripple the nutritional products industry, harm consumers and do absolutely nothing to stem the tide of laboratory-concocted, performance-enhancing drug hybrids masquerading as dietary supplements.

Problems in the bill serious enough to make the bill a completely un-fixable and untenable piece of legislation include:

  1. Creating completely outrageous facility registration requirements for all brands, products and ingredients, similar to the unworkable European Food Supplements Directive (EFSD) despite the fact that US food facilities are already required to be registered;
  2. Effectively removing the Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) status of most major herbs and botanical ingredients, thereby deeming most (if not all) herbals as “adulterated” unless they are included on the FDA’s “Accepted Dietary Ingredients” list;
  3. Mandating the creation and maintenance of voluminous safety dossiers on every dietary supplement and ingredient;
  4. Requiring that “all adverse events” (not just serious adverse events) relating to supplements be reported, including non-serious, trivial and unsubstantiated reports which will make the effective adverse reporting system supported by Citizen For Health unworkable; and
  5. Codifying arbitrary and capricious cease and desist and recall authority based merely on the FDA’s “reasonable probability” that an item is adulterated or misbranded — this action can be taken regardless of whether the manufacturer is properly challenging the order;

This bills’ proposed establishment of an approved list of ingredients (much like EFSD’s approved lists of supplement ingredients and ingredient forms) is something to which the U.S. government (specifically the U.S. Codex delegation) has been adamantly opposed — so why would that same U.S. government endeavor to create “lists” within America’s own borders that it sees fit to battle against internationally?

The proposed provision that would require adverse events to be reported would bog the AER system down with hundreds if not thousands of trivial and product-unrelated reports; this would serve to bury reports noting potential areas of concern (signal events) in a garbage heap of useless information.

We ask all members of the U.S. Senate to NOT sponsor this misdirected, supplement-scapegoating bill that does nothing to fix the performance-enhancement spiking problems endemic within professional sports today. We also ask members of congress to demand that FDA use its existing ample authority to force off the market all products falsely branded as herbal products or dietary supplements particularly those that contain dangerous ingredients that the law already makes illegal.

# # #

I am a one of the “Strong Moms” (Trademark, Abbott Laboratories)

Although I had a home birth and have never taken my new son to a doctor’s office, I somehow managed to be targeted for the “Strong Moms” (TM) campaign.  The initial mailings were generic take-care-of-yourself promotions, with cute images of babies and healthy-looking women.  I honestly could not figure out what they wanted from me.

Yesterday, all became clear when I received two complementary cases of Similac.

Being a healthy, breastfeeding mother, I have never had reason to look at formula ingredients.  Only one of my children ever needed formula (5 bottles total); after catching an upper respiratory infection that landed me totally dried up in the emergency room, my husband fed her something (I know not what), and she became so constipated he had to give our then-5-month old an enema.  After getting 3 bags of IV into my system, I pumped every 15 minutes for a full day until my supply was back, and treated sick people with hostility for the following year.

At any rate, I decided to look at the ingredients of this gift for me – one of the “Strong Moms” (TM)  targeted in this campaign – and my jaw literally dropped to the floor.  I’m sure the lactation people out there know all this, but here’s a reiteration of a few of the main ingredients of one the cans of Similac that was mistakenly mailed to me, with a little of my own online research thrown in:

43.2% Corn Syrup Solids. Corn syrup, which consists mostly of dextrose, is a sweet, thick liquid made by treating cornstarch with acids or enzymes. It may be dried and used as corn syrup solids in coffee whiteners and other dry products. Corn syrup contains no nutritional value other than calories, promotes tooth decay, and is used mainly in foods with little intrinsic nutritional value.  http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm

14.6% Soy Protein Isolate. A very large percentage of soy – over 90% – is genetically modified and it also has one of the highest percentages contamination by pesticides of any of the foods we eat.  Soy protein isolate (SPI) is not something you can make in your own kitchen. Production takes place in industrial factories where soybeans are first mixed with an alkaline solution to remove fiber, then precipitated and separated using an acid wash and, finally, neutralized in an alkaline solution.  Acid washing in aluminum tanks leaches high levels of aluminum into the final product. As a result, soy-based formula also has over 1000% more aluminum than conventional milk based formulas. Finally, the resulting curds are spray-dried at high temperatures to produce a high-protein powder. A final hardship to the original soybean is high-temperature, high-pressure extrusion processing of soy protein isolate to produce textured vegetable protein.  Nitrites, which are potent carcinogens, are formed during spray-drying, and a toxin called “lysinoalanine” is formed during alkaline processing.  Numerous artificial flavorings, particularly MSG, are added to soy protein isolate and textured vegetable protein products to mask their strong “beany” taste. http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/soy.htm

10.3% Sugar (Sucrose). Added sugar in infant formula, specifically sucrose, is linked with several health risks, including damage to tooth enamel, a preference for more sweet foods and the inclination to overeat. Research shows that babies and children prefer sweeter foods and tend to eat more of it than foods that are less sweet. Babies who overeat and have rapid weight gain in the first year are more likely to become obese during childhood.  http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/113347.php

The materials they sent with the formula include an attractive little booklet with 7 pages on how to breastfeed, then 6  pages on how to pump and store breastmilk, then 16 pages on the basics of formula and supplementing for the busy mom, then 14 pages of advertisements on the varieties of Similac formulas.

Abbott Laboratories has gone to a whole new level with their newest campaign. Perhaps we need a short addendum to Cate Colburn-Smith’s program, which highlights the strategies and effectiveness of the marketing of these “cans of crap”.

I like to think of myself as one of the “Strong Moms” (TM).  However, it took very little strength to pick up these cans and throw them into the nearest trashcan.